Guest Post - Banned Books Course at Franklin Pierce

February 03, 2018 7:50 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

Reflections from Franklin Pierce student, Brianna Bourque:

There is a course called Banned Books taught at Franklin Pierce University in Rindge, NH. I am a freshman here at the university and I decided to take the course during the school year 2017-2018. During the course, we read approximately a dozen banned books like Lysistrata, Witches, Looking for Alaska, and Fanny Hill. While reading the book, we would discuss the author's intention for creating it, why we think the book was banned, and why we think the story should be kept on the shelves in schools, and libraries. The reason I took the course was to see how society's views of inappropriate book topics have changed over time. After learning what I did in Banned Books, I can say that it was a very challenging and fascinating experience.

An important aspect of the class, that was very challenging, was an individual project called the Library Censorship Report. For this we were required to contact one school library and one public library, and to request that they inform us their book challenging policy, the process if it were to occur, and any history they have of books being banned there. For this assignment, I decided to reach out to my old high school library (Merrimack Valley High School) and the New Hampshire State Library(NHSL). Upon contacting the two libraries via snail mail, I received word that neither had ever received a request to have a book banned, or even challenged. But after speaking with the librarian there, Rebecca Stockbridge, my contact information was then sent to four more people. I soon discovered by speaking with Jessica Gilcreast, the Bedford High School Librarian, that there was a book challenge at Bedford High School many years ago. The book was eventually pulled from the curriculum, but is still available in the school library.

After reading through the minutes and the process it takes to ban a book, I became very appreciative of my ability to read the twelve banned books during my course. I also became very thankful that no books had ever been challenged or banned in my high school, because I would have been missing out on learning opportunities. Through taking the course, I have also become more aware of how often books get banned or challenged in the U.S., and which states it is more likely to happen in. I intend to use this knowledge of book challenges and bans to prevent them so others can continue to learn, and I also would like to continue passing my knowledge of this onto others so they can hopefully prevent bans too. 


  • March 30, 2018 1:23 AM | DAVID
    First time I am visiting this blog. I found so many entertaining stuff in this blog, especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the leisure here! Keep up the excellent work.

    Visit :
    Link  •  Reply
    • February 04, 2019 6:13 PM | Isabelle Edmond
      People loves to take the cats as a pet. The book defines in to understand the changing behaviours of the cat. The way you treat your cat will beneficial for both of them. The cats seems as a good pet because psychologist said that the cats owner release your frustration in one go
      Link  •  Reply
  • July 16, 2018 1:38 AM | jyothi.chipbyte
    How do you skyrocket your book sales without a bigger platform, email list, paid traffic, or PR?

    It starts by understanding how your readers buy books today, and how you can reach them (without a huge marketing budget).

    I've found something that can show you how.

    Bestseller Ranking Pro provides authors and publishers with live data on every single bestseller list on Amazon for eBooks and physical books (all 19,669 of them and counting), as well as advanced video trainings on how to maximize your sales and sales rankings on Amazon.

    Check it out here:
    Link  •  Reply
  • January 02, 2019 11:45 PM | Luis Milla
    I think the issue of whether a patron should have had to read or watch an item before asking that it be banned is a difficult one. On the one hand, you obviously don’t want to have someone who has no understanding of what the item is making decisions about it, but it also seems unfair to ask someone who objects to, is disturbed by, is disgusted by (etc.) something to have to carefully study it before making a complaint. I would want to say that the patron should have examined the item, but not necessarily read or watched the whole thing, but where do you draw the line?

    cetak spanduk jakarta
    Link  •  Reply
Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software